Hot Posts

6/recent/ticker-posts

Shutdown was never about policy — it was about hating Trump


The federal government shutdown is finally coming to an end — but the Democratic psychodrama is far from over.

What was billed as a principled stand over health care subsidies has turned out, on closer inspection, to be little more than another exercise in political theater — and a revealing one at that. Behind the posturing, the hashtags, and the endless soundbites on cable news, the longest government shutdown in U.S. history wasn’t about policy. It was about emotion. It was about rage. Specifically, it was about giving progressives a way to vent their unreasoning hatred of President Donald Trump.

A Shutdown Nobody Won

Let’s start with a truth Washington should have learned by now: government shutdowns don’t work. They don’t achieve their intended goals, they anger the public, and they leave both sides bruised. The party that engineers the shutdown always ends up shouldering the blame. It’s political law of gravity.

Democrats knew this — yet they plunged ahead anyway, shutting down the government over a demand that Republicans extend Obamacare subsidies that were first passed in 2021 and renewed in 2022 under Joe Biden. Those subsidies were always temporary, but Democrats suddenly decided they were sacred.

The claim that these subsidies were so crucial that they justified closing the government was absurd from the start. Yet progressives insisted that unless Republicans agreed to make them permanent, they would keep the government shuttered — regardless of the pain inflicted on federal workers, travelers, small businesses, and ordinary Americans.

When the dust settled, Democrats came away with virtually nothing. Not a legislative victory. Not a deal. Not even a real promise. All they got was a weak commitment for a Senate vote on the subsidies — a vote that almost certainly won’t pass.

As one frustrated Democratic senator admitted afterward, “It’s complete BS.” He wasn’t wrong.

The Policy Excuse That Wasn’t

Why did Democrats pick this fight?

The official justification — protecting health care subsidies — was flimsy. The shutdown could just as easily have been about immigration, climate policy, or LGBTQIA+ issues. Progressives simply needed a vehicle, and health care was the most convenient one. It polls well, it sounds compassionate, and it gives them a familiar battlefield.

But make no mistake: this was never really about health care. It was about opposition — raw, emotional, unrelenting opposition to Trump and everything he represents.

Progressives have convinced themselves that every political dispute must be a moral crusade against Trumpism. If Trump supports it, they must oppose it. If Trump opposes it, they must support it. Their politics are not about policies or outcomes anymore — they’re about outrage.

The shutdown, in that light, wasn’t a legislative tactic. It was a primal scream.

A “Futile and Stupid Gesture”

The whole episode called to mind the famous line from Animal House: “This situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody’s part.” Democrats obliged.

The shutdown was futile — it achieved nothing. It was stupid — it hurt millions of Americans. But for progressives, it was emotionally satisfying. It allowed them to perform defiance, to dramatize their opposition to Trump, to feel like warriors in an existential struggle.

Even though President Trump has been back in the White House for nearly a year, progressives still can’t process his victory or the failure of their political project. The return of Trump has broken something inside the Democratic Party. Their policies are increasingly reactive, their rhetoric increasingly apocalyptic. This shutdown was their way of saying, “We still hate him, and we’re not done fighting.”

But that kind of politics — politics as therapy — doesn’t work. It only exposes how disconnected progressives have become from ordinary voters who just want stability, lower costs, and functioning government.

Schumer’s Predicament

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer found himself cornered. He knew a shutdown was a loser politically. But he also knew that the progressive base, whipped into fury by social media and MSNBC talking heads, would accuse him of weakness if he didn’t “stand up to Trump.”

Schumer’s political instincts told him to compromise; his survival instincts told him to posture. And posturing won.

Ever since his brush with progressive anger in previous years — especially when he refused to shut down the government during Biden’s tenure — Schumer has lived in fear of his own base. The specter of a primary challenge from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez looms large. To avoid another rebellion, he embraced the shutdown, hoping it would appease the left.

It didn’t.

When the shutdown dragged on, moderate Democrats began defecting, urging Schumer to end the standoff. He finally caved, accepting a token deal that reopened the government while giving progressives nothing. Now those same progressives are furious again — not because he shut down the government, but because he ended it.

It’s a no-win situation for Schumer: damned if he appeases Trump, damned if he doesn’t.

The Politics of Rage

This episode underscores a broader truth: today’s progressive movement is fueled by anger, not ideas.

Since Trump’s 2016 victory — and his 2024 comeback — the left has been running on pure emotion. Their rallies, their fundraising, their messaging — all of it revolves around outrage at Trump. It’s the glue holding together a coalition that otherwise can’t agree on much.

That anger has helped Democrats in the short term by keeping their base energized. But in the long term, it’s corrosive. It drives bad strategy, like this shutdown. It alienates moderates and independents who see Democrats as obsessed with revenge rather than results. And it blinds the party to the simple fact that governing requires compromise.

Shutting down the government didn’t hurt Trump. It hurt Americans. And it made Democrats look reckless.

The Aftermath and the Blame Game

Now that the government is reopening, Democrats are in disarray. Progressives blame moderates for “selling out.” Moderates blame progressives for “losing their minds.” Each side insists the other caved too soon or fought too stupidly.

Meanwhile, President Trump and congressional Republicans are standing tall. They refused to give in, stayed unified, and let Democrats self-destruct. For once, the GOP looks like the responsible party — the adults in the room.

And that’s what really stings for Democrats. Their grand display of defiance ended with Trump looking stronger than before.

The Lessons They Won’t Learn

Will Democrats learn anything from this mess? Probably not.

The political incentives on the left still reward the loudest, angriest voices. Progressives like Gavin Newsom and Pete Buttigieg — both clearly eyeing 2028 — opposed the shutdown deal precisely to shore up their anti-Trump credentials. Among Democratic activists, “fighting Trump” remains the ultimate test of purity.

So, even though this shutdown backfired spectacularly, don’t expect it to be the last one. As long as Trump sits in the Oval Office, progressives will keep finding excuses to vent their fury — no matter the cost to the country or their own party.

Conclusion: The Politics of Self-Destruction

In the end, this record-breaking shutdown accomplished nothing but confirming what many Americans already suspected: Washington’s dysfunction is no longer about policy. It’s about emotion.

Democrats didn’t close the government because of health care. They closed it because they can’t stand Donald Trump. The shutdown was their way of expressing that hatred — a costly, self-defeating gesture masquerading as principle.

And now that it’s over, nothing has changed. The government is reopening, the country is weary, and the Democrats are angrier than ever.

It wasn’t about policy. It was about passion — the kind that blinds a movement and consumes its leaders.

The shutdown may have ended, but the progressive psychodrama goes on.