FBI seeks interviews with lawmakers over video urging troops to question orders

The FBI has requested interviews with six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a video advising U.S. military personnel to refuse orders they believe to be illegal. The request, reported by multiple news outlets, follows escalating tensions between the lawmakers and the Trump administration over the content of the video.

The lawmakers, all of whom have military backgrounds, appeared in the video reminding service members of their oath to uphold the Constitution. They raised concerns over recent strikes on vessels suspected of drug trafficking, suggesting that some actions may have violated U.S. or international law. According to reports, some military personnel have reportedly shared similar concerns.

The video has drawn swift condemnation from the Trump administration. Officials have defended the strikes as legal, citing the administration’s designation of certain drug traffickers as terrorists. President Trump and other senior figures labeled the video seditious, with some officials warning it could endanger military personnel by undermining confidence in lawful orders.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterized the lawmakers’ statements as creating confusion within the armed forces. He noted that while most of the legislators are not subject to military law, one, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, is a retired Navy captain and therefore accountable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Pentagon announced a review of Kelly’s actions to determine whether any regulations were violated.

The lawmakers involved include Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, as well as Representatives Jason Crow of Wisconsin, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania. All have prior military or intelligence experience.

The investigation by the FBI is reportedly intended to determine whether the lawmakers engaged in any unlawful activity. The agency has not provided public comment on the matter.

The episode highlights growing tensions over military conduct, civilian oversight, and how elected officials engage with service members on matters of legality and ethics. While the lawmakers’ message was framed around constitutional obligations, the administration views the statements as a challenge to lawful authority.