In a landmark decision poised to transform the landscape of college sports, a federal judge approved a $2.8 billion settlement on Friday, June 6, allowing schools to directly compensate student-athletes and establishing a decade-long revenue-sharing framework beginning in the 2025–26 season.
The settlement marks the most significant shift in the NCAA's treatment of college athletes, providing a formal mechanism for schools to share the profits generated through athletics with the students who help create them. Under the agreement, schools that choose to participate will distribute approximately $20.5 million annually in name, image, and likeness (NIL) revenue to their athletes — a figure likely to reshape the economics of collegiate athletics.
Past Damages and Future Compensation
A key component of the settlement involves nearly $2.8 billion in retroactive damages to current and former Division I athletes who were barred from receiving NIL compensation prior to recent policy changes. These payments will cover lost opportunities dating back to 2016, compensating players for a period in which the NCAA prohibited them from profiting from their personal brand while schools and conferences generated billions in media, ticket, and sponsorship revenue.
This represents not only financial redress, but also an acknowledgment that athletes' commercial value has long been a cornerstone of college sports — even if it went uncompensated for years.
Voluntary Participation and Notable Holdouts
While the revenue-sharing framework opens a new door for athlete compensation, participation remains voluntary. Schools that opt in will not be required to distribute the full $20.5 million each year, allowing for some flexibility in implementation.
One prominent outlier is the Ivy League, which has chosen to opt out entirely. The league has consistently emphasized its commitment to amateurism and academic balance, and it recently prevailed in an antitrust case defending its refusal to offer athletic scholarships. Under the new rules, Ivy League athletes will continue competing under traditional amateur standards, even as peers at other institutions receive direct compensation.
More Scholarships, Delayed Roster Changes
Originally, the proposed settlement raised alarms over potential scholarship caps that could have eliminated thousands of roster spots. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken initially rejected the terms due to concerns about reducing opportunities for non-revenue sport athletes.
Following revisions, those scholarship limitations are now expected to be phased in over time, offering schools a gradual transition and preserving more athletic opportunities in the short term. Additionally, the settlement allows for an increase in full and partial athletic scholarships, potentially broadening access for athletes in both major and minor sports.
Legal Backdrop: NCAA on the Defensive
The agreement builds upon years of legal pressure and growing public scrutiny of NCAA policies. The turning point came in 2021, when the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in NCAA v. Alston that restrictions on athlete benefits violated antitrust law. That decision opened the floodgates for NIL deals and inspired further challenges to the NCAA’s amateurism model.
This latest settlement reflects the culmination of those legal efforts and acknowledges the growing consensus that college athletes are not just students, but active participants in a billion-dollar industry.
What Comes Next?
NCAA President Charlie Baker praised the agreement as a stabilizing force in a rapidly evolving sports environment.
“This new framework that enables schools to provide direct financial benefits to student-athletes and establishes clear and specific rules to regulate third-party NIL agreements marks a huge step forward,” Baker said in a statement.
Still, questions remain. How schools will fund these payments, how recruitment strategies will adapt, and how competitive balance will be maintained are all open concerns. Smaller schools, in particular, may struggle to keep up with wealthier athletic programs.
What is clear is that college sports have entered a new chapter. Direct payments to athletes and formal revenue-sharing signal the end of an era defined by amateurism — and the beginning of one where student-athletes are finally recognized as professionals in all but name.
Key Points:
$2.8B in back pay for athletes denied NIL compensation since 2016.
$20.5M per year in NIL revenue can be shared by schools starting 2025–26.
Participation is voluntary; the Ivy League has opted out.
Limits on scholarships and roster sizes have been delayed to preserve opportunities.
Marks a historic shift in how college athletes are treated and compensated.
%20(1).jpg)
