Early Monday morning, there was a flicker of optimism on Capitol Hill. Democrats and Republicans alike hoped that a bipartisan White House meeting with President Trump and the top four congressional leaders might yield a breakthrough on a government funding deal and avert a looming shutdown.
That optimism didn’t last.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who sat down with Trump for the first time, summed up the gathering bluntly: “Significant and meaningful differences remain.” Trump, meanwhile, posted a video mocking Democratic leaders rather than signaling any real progress. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) fired back publicly, underscoring just how quickly any appearance of constructive dialogue dissolved.
Schumer’s Tightrope
Schumer enters these negotiations under pressure from multiple directions. Progressives remain frustrated over his earlier willingness to help Republicans advance a funding bill in March, and he knows another compromise could invite further backlash. At the same time, news that Schumer privately floated a week-long stopgap bill leaked before the White House meeting, angering some House Democrats who viewed it as premature surrender. His allies insist it was simply contingency planning, but the episode highlights the difficulty of balancing intra-party expectations with the need to avoid a shutdown.
The Blame Game Begins
With the shutdown deadline just days away—set to begin at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday—both parties are already bracing for fallout. Trump told Politico that “the Democrats are deranged” and expressed confidence that the public would fault them for rejecting the GOP’s short-term funding measure. Republicans have filed for a procedural vote on their continuing resolution, confident they’ve positioned themselves as the reasonable side.
Democrats, meanwhile, are betting that voters will blame Republicans, who currently control both the White House and Congress. But their demands complicate that message: they want any continuing resolution to include permanent Affordable Care Act subsidy extensions, along with reversals of various policy changes passed in reconciliation bills. Republicans argue these add-ons are unrelated to keeping the government open and accuse Democrats of hijacking the process.
Policy at the Center
At the heart of the fight are very real stakes for millions of Americans. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) pointed out that families must decide on health insurance enrollment soon, and the extension of ACA subsidies is central to those decisions. Democrats argue this makes the issue urgent; Republicans insist it should be negotiated separately, after the government is funded.
Vice President JD Vance emphasized the GOP position on Monday: Republicans are open to talking about ACA subsidies, but “only in the context of an open government.”
Strategic Risks
For Democrats, there is a danger in overplaying their hand. If they ultimately accept a pared-down funding bill later, their base may feel let down after weeks of hardline messaging. At the same time, Trump has already moved to take advantage of the situation by directing agencies to prepare for layoffs, potentially increasing his leverage in a shutdown scenario.
Some Democrats, like Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, have begun to question whether their party’s strategy is sustainable. He warns that refusing to acknowledge Trump’s tactical advantage in a shutdown risks handing him more power, not less.
Where Things Stand
As of now, there is no agreement in sight. Both parties are maneuvering not just to shape the terms of a funding bill, but also to control the narrative of blame when the government shutters. Each side is producing messaging videos for constituents, framing the other as the obstacle.
In the end, the real question isn’t whether a funding bill will eventually pass—it almost certainly will—but how much political damage both parties will endure in the meantime. And judging by the unproductive White House meeting, the chances of resolving those “significant and meaningful differences” anytime soon appear slim.
0 Comments