Attorneys for Democratic Texas agriculture commissioner candidate Clayton Tucker are challenging whether Republican nominee Nate Sheets meets the legal qualifications for the office, escalating an already contentious statewide race weeks before the November election.

In a letter sent Tuesday to Republican Party of Texas Chair D’rinda Randall, attorneys with Marziani, Stevens & Gonzalez PLLC argued that Sheets lacks the agricultural experience required under state law. Tucker’s legal team is asking Republican Party leaders to review Sheets’ qualifications and potentially declare him ineligible.

“The public record shows that Nathan Sheets is not qualified to serve as Texas’ next Agriculture Commissioner because he does not meet the criteria for that office as set forth in Texas law,” the letter reads.

Under Texas law, Tucker’s attorneys say, a candidate for agriculture commissioner must have spent at least five of the previous 10 years engaged in the business of agriculture. Other qualifying experience can include five years of work for an agriculture-related government agency or the Texas Agricultural Council, or owning and operating a farm or ranch that qualifies for agricultural use for at least five years.

Tucker’s legal team argues Sheets does not meet those requirements.

Among the records cited by the attorneys is Sheets’ ownership of Honey Rock Ranch in Burnet. Tucker’s team claims Sheets has owned the ranch for only four years, falling short of the five-year requirement. The attorneys also argue that the roughly 10,000-acre property is owned by an LLC rather than Sheets personally.

The challenge also takes aim at Sheets’ background with Nature Nate’s, the honey company he founded. Tucker’s attorneys contend the company does not produce agricultural crops because it obtains honey from other beekeepers. They further argue that honey does not qualify as a crop and bees do not qualify as livestock for purposes of meeting the statutory requirement.

Sheets rejected the challenge and characterized it as a desperate political move by his Democratic opponent.

“This is a fourth-quarter, last-ditch attempt by Clayton Tucker to avoid his imminent defeat at the ballot box,” Sheets said.

Sheets’ campaign also turned the eligibility question back on Tucker, arguing that the Democrat’s own employment history raises questions about whether he meets the requirements for the office.

The campaign pointed to Tucker’s financial paperwork listing his occupation as an organizer for the Trade Justice Education Fund, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit advocacy organization. Tucker is listed on the organization’s website as a program associate.

Sheets’ campaign also cited a YouTube video that it says contains a screenshot of Tucker’s now-deleted LinkedIn profile showing a work history largely connected to politics.

According to Sheets’ campaign, Tucker “has spent the last decade running for office or working in politics, not making his living farming or ranching.”

Tucker disputes that characterization. In a statement, he said he grew up working on his family’s ranch and described agriculture as part of his life rather than a “campaign prop.”

He also took direct aim at Sheets’ experience with beekeeping and ranching.

“Owning a small number of beehives in Frisco does not count,” Tucker said. “Data Nate has not owned his hobbyist ranch long enough for it to count under Texas law.”

Tucker’s attorneys gave the Texas GOP three business days to respond to the letter and called on party officials to publicly release their findings and conclusions to voters.

The eligibility dispute adds another layer to a race that has already become unusually contentious for an office Republicans have controlled since the 1990s.

Outgoing Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller has also drawn attention to the contest. Miller, a Republican, said last month that he believes his party could lose the office, pointing to political backlash surrounding the rapid growth of data centers and the debate over THC restrictions. Miller and Tucker have found some common ground in their criticism of data center development and its potential effects on Texas resources.

For now, Tucker is pressing Republican Party officials to determine whether Sheets meets the statutory requirements to appear on the ballot and serve as agriculture commissioner.

“Texans deserve answers,” Tucker said. “We expect the Republican Party of Texas to review the evidence, follow the law and tell the people of Texas what it finds.”