Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in abortion pill case

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear its first abortion case since the controversial Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. The high court announced it will hear oral arguments in the case on access to abortion drug, mifepristone, in March.

Mifepristone is one of two abortion drugs used to end a pregnancy.

“It works by stopping the supply of hormones that maintains the interior of the uterus,” a Mayo Clinic drug information sheet stated. “Without these hormones, the uterus cannot support the pregnancy and the contents of the uterus are expelled.”

Medication abortions account for half of abortions in the United States, according to the CDC. Mifepristone has been used in 5 million abortion cases, and the FDA said adverse events associated with its use are low. The FDA approved mifepristone for use back in 2000.

In June 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe, ruling the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Later that year in November, a group of physicians with the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, which opposes abortion, brought a challenge against the FDA’s mifepristone approval.

The group argued the FDA did not adequately consider the safety of mifepristone before approving the drug.

The plaintiffs argued to reverse FDA measures implemented since 2016 that made mifepristone easier to obtain and more unsafe for patient use. Those measures included:

Allowing the pill to be taken later in pregnancy at 10 weeks, as opposed to 7 weeks.

Creating a generic version of the drug.

Allowing doctors to prescribe it and distribute it by mail.

In April 2023, a U.S. District Court judge in Texas put a hold on the FDA’s 2000 approval of mifepristone. The Biden administration then appealed to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“First and foremost, when you turn upside down the entire FDA approval process, you’re not talking about just mifepristone, you’re talking about every kind of drug,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. “You’re talking about our vaccines, you’re talking about insulin, you’re talking about the new Alzheimer’s drugs that may come on. If a judge decides to substitute his preferences, his personal opinion, for that of scientists and medical professionals, what drug isn’t subject to some kind of legal challenge?”

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the FDA’s original approval of mifepristone. However, the three-judge panel nullified the changes put in place by the FDA that made mifepristone easier to access in 2016.

The FDA argued if those restrictions are allowed to take place, it would cause widespread chaos. So, the Supreme Court then intervened and blocked that ruling, allowing mifepristone to stay on the market with no changes to how it’s prescribed while the case plays out in the lower courts.

Mifepristone’s manufacturer, Danco Laboratories, and the Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to review the 5th Circuit Court’s ruling, which the high court agreed to in December.

Oral arguments are set for March 26 and a decision is expected to come down in June.

Dan Butcher

Dan Butcher (aka HP Pundit) is not a Democrat or Republican. He is a free thinking independent bringing you news and commentary with a dose of much needed common sense.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post